_hero.webp "QfelniME(1)")
What is NATO, officially
NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) is an intergovernmental military alliance created in 1949 by the Treaty of Washington, with the declared purpose of collective defence: "an attack against one is considered an attack against all" (Article 5).
NATO members commit themselves to military and political cooperation for transatlantic security.
The concept ("an attack against one is considered an attack against all") is the slogan of the Army of the whole, on the great day of the great year, where we have one military force and we are all on the law of one, but it represents a level of consciousness on the great year's day, which has obviously been misunderstood on this night of the great year.
This motto refers to the divine knowledge (from the great year's day) which explains that together we form one whole; thus, this confusion due to the lack of knowledge and the far too high claims of some criminal groups formed on the night of the great year, representâand a group lesson of the creators and members of these dark formations who have no authority to create military alliances on this earthânot on the night of the great year and certainly not on the day of the great year, thus the lesson of this criminal group is, an attack against all is an attack against all and you a criminal group created by criminal states that have oppressed this earth for thousands of years, who have plundered, invaded, plundered, who have no authority, no lands, no nothing but dark karma on this earth, surely you are caught by your lessons against the whole.
Criticisms, accusations and controversial facts
These are concrete examples and accusations that have piled up over the years - not all definitively proven, but with enough sources to be considered.
Interventions without UN mandate / sovereignty impaired
Bombing of Yugoslavia (1999) - Operation Allied Force: NATO launched air campaigns against Yugoslavia without formal UN Security Council approval. Civilian infrastructure, state institutions, cultural etc were destroyed. Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2
The Radio Television of Serbia (RTS) murder: On the night of April 23, 1999, the Serbian public television headquarters was hit by a NATO attack, causing the death of 16 employees. Wikipedia
Civilian casualties and collateral damage
In Operation Allied Force, estimates range from ~489 to ~528 civilians confirmed by organizations such as Human Rights Watch as killed, plus a much higher number (1.000+ local estimates) in total, including wounded and missing. Wikipedia+1
Destruction of bridges, hospitals, electricity grids, social infrastructure during bombings. Wikipedia+1
Expansion and threat perception
NATO repeatedly expanded eastward after the fall of the Soviet bloc. Some states (notably Russia) argue that this expansion was perceived as a direct threat to their borders. Meer+2Diplomatic Watch+2
Promises or perceived promises made at the outset that NATO would not expand after German reunification - there is debate about whether these formally existed, and what significance they had. NATO+1
Internal difficulties and weak cohesion
States where allies fall short of 2% of GDP defense spending target. Pressure from the US on allies to increase military spending. OwnMeta News | Latest Breaking News...+1
Differences in perception and strategy between member states: what collective defense means, how much to spend, what risks to take (e.g. relationship with Russia, policy towards enlargement, towards Ukraine, etc.). Meer+1
Moral and legal legitimacy issues
Interventions have been criticized for violations of other states' sovereignty, without clear international approvals or a UN mandate (and this generates resentment, perceptions of imperialism).
Moral and psychological damage to affected populations: refugees, families torn apart, infrastructure destroyed, loss of civilian life - all create long-term trauma.
Negative geopolitical effects
Risk of military escalation: Increased military presence in border states, exercises, defensive/offensive systems close to foreign borders - all raise tensions and can provoke defensive reactions, counter-measures.
International polarization: Russia or other actors use NATO enlargement as justification for strengthening their own armed forces, weapons development, propaganda justification.
Impacts and bottlenecks generated
Populations physically and psychologically affected by wars and interventions.
Destruction of infrastructure imposing high reconstruction costs.
Destruction or disruption of local communities' way of life.
Increasing militarism and decreasing investment in human areas (education, health, culture) in member states due to prioritization of military spending.
Increasing fear and "us vs. them" mentality, separation, which feeds division and darkness of conscience.
What's said in NATO's defense/contrary perspectives
NATO members say interventions (such as Kosovo) have been necessary to prevent genocide, ethnic cleansing, or mass suffering.
There is the argument that Eastern states wanted to join NATO for protection after decades of Soviet domination or uncertain influence, and that their membership is an expression of sovereign will.
Case example: Yugoslavia/Kosovo
Operation Allied Force (1999) - aerial bombing continuous for ~78 days. Extensive destruction, significant civilian casualties. Wikipedia+2Wikipedia+2
Lack of clear UN mandate for all actions; some actions considered by UN/human rights organizations as violations of international law.
NATO is controlled by only a few groups, with the US in the lead, a criminal group with no legitimacy created on the big year night by another group of repeaters/ex graduates of this form. The rest of 30 member states are just tools, with no real voice in decisions.
NATO = Instrument of War and Fragmentation
At this stage of planetary evolution, mankind awakens from the illusion of fragmentation and understands that there are no competing "military alliances", but only a 2400 year old divided whole, where all students of this form are part of the whole in a school of consciousness where, clearly, NATO represents absolutely nothing decâât just another darkness arrived at the gates of heaven.
In the place of the old aggressive military structures stands a single planetary army of Light, guided by the archetype of this form and placed under the authority of the divine, not the will of the ego or the students of this form.
Organizations created without divine authority - even if they bore noble names - were in reality fragmentations of the whole that did not serve the whole, but their own interests and those of their creators on the night of the great year.
Creating military alliances without roots in divine consciousness cannot bring peace. NATO's experience is a planetary lesson: without harmony with the whole, any construction remains a focus of darkness that cannot bring decât conflict.
NATO is a mirror of the ages of the night.
Afghanistan (2001-2021) - invasion under the pretext of terrorism
Iraq (2003) - invasion under the pretext of weapons of mass destruction
Libya (2011) - intervention under the pretext of civilian protection
Afghanistan (2001-2021) - 20 years of war, hundreds of thousands dead
Iraq (2003-2011) - illegal invasion, millions dead
Libya (2011) - state destruction, modern slavery
Syria (2011-present) - perpetual civil war,
Afghanistan (2001-2021) - Operation Enduring Freedom
Iraq (2003-2011) - Operation Iraqi Freedom
Libya (2011) - Operation Unified Protector
Syria (2011-present) - Support for rebels
Bosnia (1992-1995) - Operation Deliberate Force
Kosovo (1999) - Operation Allied Force
Somalia (1992-1995) - Operation Restore Hope
Haiti (1994)** - Operation Uphold Democracy
Bosnia (1995-present) - IFOR/SFOR/EUFOR
Kosovo (1999-present) - KFOR
Afghanistan (2001-2021) - ISAF/Resolute Support
Iraq (2003-2011) - NTM-I
Steadfast Defender - Massive annual exercises
Trident Juncture - Exercises in Norway
Defender Europe - Exercises in Eastern Europe
Baltic Operations - Exercises in the Baltic Sea
Expansion eastward - Breaking promises
Missile deployment - direct threat
Massive spying - violation of sovereignty
The end of dark organizations
As the planet steps into the new solar age, all structures created by the students of life dissolve. The light does not negotiate with the darkness, but transcends it through unity and truth.
The age of the Sun begins - the age in which the ultimate authority is lived truth, not decreed by some student of life. Mankind is learning that true power comes not from institutions, but from consciousness.
I, the High Priest, the archetype of this form, by virtue of my authority over the cycles of time and the Planetary School, declare the following:
Any military alliance or aggressive structure formed on the night of the great year and reached the gates of heaven is hereby, forthwith, disbanded. The members of these formations, being caught up in the lessons of darkness and illegitimate before creation, are hereby relieved of all rights of command over the students of this planetary school.
**The reason I am canceling all military alliances is for the simple fact that I understand that this lesson to humanity can only lead to the destruction and fragmentation of humanity. If I do not take a stand now, then this lesson of humanity will bring only destruction and suffering, and it is for this very reason that I am taking a stand to protect the integrity of the planetary school and all of creation.
Notă editorială:
Acest articol este în continuă dezvoltare și va fi reactualizat periodic. Deși am depus eforturi pentru acuratețe, esența profundă a acestui articol poate necesita rafinări ulterioare.
Cel Mai Comentat Audit of creation
The end of the G7 Great Powers Club
The Group of 7 (G7) was created in 1975, not for democracy, but for elitist global control, unaware that from so many elites there are planetary examples of the entrance of the big day. ...